We’ve discovered EAST retention commitments on materials that are not under the library’s direct control, e.g. a departmental library.
We’ve found some titles in our retention commitments that are bound with other titles that are not committed to retain. Should we add retention commitments to all titles in ‘bound with’ volumes?
We’ve found some titles in our retention commitments that are bound with other titles that are not committed to retain. Should we add retention commitments to all titles in ‘bound with’ volumes?
We’ve found bound photocopies or other print facsimiles, or sections of monographs replaced with photocopied pages, which have a retention commitment on them. Should we keep the commitment?
We’ve found bound photocopies or other print facsimiles, or sections of monographs replaced with photocopied pages, which have a retention commitment on them. Should we keep the commitment?
We’ve discovered that the bibliographic data for an item for which we have a retention commitment does not match the book on the shelf. Can we withdraw the retention commitment?
We’ve discovered that the bibliographic data for an item for which we have a retention commitment does not match the book on the shelf. Can we withdraw the retention commitment?
We’ve identified a category of materials that have retention commitments but that we consider out of scope and not worthy of retention. What should we do?
We’ve identified a category of materials that have retention commitments but that we consider out of scope for this project and not worthy of retention. What should we do?
We’ve made some updates to retentions in OCLC. Do we need to update Gold Rush also? If so, how?
We've made some updates to retentions in OCLC. Do we need to update Gold Rush also? If so, how?